Menu

Unit I: Naturalism to Modernism

[ENGL 602] American Literature and Culture since 1900 - Masters of Arts in English

This chapter traces the shift from late‑19th‑century Naturalism, with its focus on heredity, environment, and deterministic forces, to the early‑20th‑century Modernist innovations that emphasized subjective perception, formal experimentation, and the interrogation of modernity. Through close readings of key texts by Marinetti, Glaspell, Stein, Frost, Pound, and O’Neill, students will explore how American writers re‑imagined narrative voice, gendered spaces, and the relationship between technology and human experience. The unit concludes with a synthesis of recurring themes—fragmentation, juxtaposition, and the critique of progress—and introduces critical lenses for further analysis.

[ENGL 602] American Literature and Culture since 1900 No MCQ questions available for this chapter.

Unit I: Naturalism to Modernism

Summary

The period covered in this unit marks a decisive turning point in American literature. Beginning with the Naturalist insistence that human lives are shaped by immutable biological and social forces, writers such as Theodore Dreiser and Frank Norris laid the groundwork for a literature that exposed the harsh realities of industrialization and urban poverty. As the twentieth century unfolded, a new generation of artists rejected the deterministic worldview in favor of exploring interior consciousness, linguistic experimentation, and the fragmented experience of modern life. Filippo Tommaso Marinetti’s 1909 Manifesto of Futurism heralded a celebration of speed, technology, and violent rupture with the past, while figures like Susan Glaspell, Gertrude Stein, Robert Frost, Ezra Pound, and Eugene O’Neill pursued more nuanced, introspective, and formally innovative strategies. Together, these works illustrate a movement from external determinism to internal experimentation, setting the stage for the rich pluralism of American modernism.

Characters

Although this unit surveys multiple genres, several works feature central characters whose inner lives embody the transition from Naturalist determinism to Modernist subjectivity.

  • Susan Glaspell’s Trifles: Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters, two farmwomen whose quiet observation uncovers the motive behind a murder, revealing the hidden knowledge embedded in the domestic sphere.
  • Gertrude Stein’s The Making of Americans (Introduction): The unnamed “woman” who repeats “She was a woman who was a woman was a woman…”, serving as a linguistic experiment that blurs individual identity and highlights the fluidity of self.
  • Robert Frost’s speakers: In “After Apple‑Picking” a weary laborer hovering between sleep and wakefulness; in “Design” an observer contemplating a spider, a moth, and a white heal‑all, questioning the presence of benevolent design in nature.
  • Ezra Pound’s personae: The lyrical “I” in “Queen‑Anne’s‑Lace” who juxtaposes purity and erotic tension, and the detached observer in “Landscape with the Fall of Icarus” who notes the world’s indifference to individual tragedy.
  • Eugene O’Neill’s Long Day’s Journey into Night: The Tyrone family—James (the patriarch), Mary (the morphine‑addicted mother), Jamie (the bitter elder son), and Edmund (the tubercular younger son)—whose interactions expose addiction, denial, and the search for truth amid familial fog.

Plot

Because the unit encompasses disparate texts, the “plot” section outlines the narrative or dramatic arc of each representative work, highlighting how structure reflects the broader shift from Naturalist causality to Modernist fragmentation.

Marinetti – Manifesto of Futurism (excerpt)

The manifesto is not a narrative but a programmatic proclamation. It calls for the abandonment of tradition, the exaltation of speed, machinery, violence, and youth, and advocates a new poetic language—“words‑in‑freedom”—that liberates syntax from conventional grammar.

Glaspell – Trifles

Set in a farmhouse kitchen, the play unfolds as the County Sheriff, his wife, the Prosecutor, and two neighboring women investigate the murder of John Wright. While the men dismiss the women’s concerns as “trifles,” Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters discover a dead canary and a quilt with uneven stitching, deducing that Mrs. Wright killed her husband in response to his cruelty. The women conceal this evidence, embodying a silent solidarity that subverts patriarchal authority.

Stein – “Introduction” to The Making of Americans

The introduction dispenses with traditional plot; instead, Stein presents a repetitive, present‑tense meditation on identity. Through the incessant restatement “She was a woman who was a woman was a woman…”, the text enacts a process of becoming, emphasizing the continual construction of self rather than a fixed narrative trajectory.

Frost – “After Apple‑Picking” & “Design”

“After Apple‑Picking” follows a speaker who, after a day of harvesting apples, drifts into a half‑sleep state, haunted by the sensation of lingering apples and the sense of an unfinished task. The poem moves from concrete sensory detail to a metaphysical meditation on sleep, labor, and the possibility of immortality. “Design” presents a sonnet in which the speaker observes a white spider holding a white moth on a white heal‑all flower, questioning whether this juxtaposition signifies a deliberate design or a random, indifferent occurrence.

Pound – “Queen‑Anne’s‑Lace” & “Landscape with the Fall of Icarus”

“Queen‑Anne’s‑Lace” presents a tightly imagined scene: a field of white wildflowers evoked with precise visual detail, suggesting both purity and an undercurrent of erotic tension. The poem’s imagist economy forces the reader to linger on the sensory impression. “Landscape with the Fall of Icarus” references Pieter Bruegel’s painting, noting how the ploughman continues his work indifferent to the tiny figure of Icarus falling from the sky—a comment on modernity’s disregard for individual tragedy amidst relentless progress.

O’Neill – Long Day’s Journey into Night

The play unfolds over a single day in the summer home of the Tyrone family. As the fog rolls in and out, the characters engage in cyclical conversations that reveal James’s miserliness and failed acting career, Mary’s relapse into morphine addiction, Jamie’s cynical alcoholism, and Edmund’s confrontation with tuberculosis. The layered dialogue, punctuated by the recurring motif of the foghorn, exposes the family’s inability to escape their past while simultaneously yearning for truth and redemption.

Themes

Several interlocking themes emerge across the texts, illustrating the transition from Naturalist determinism to Modernist experimentation.

ThemeRepresentative Text(s)Explanation
Determinism vs. AgencyDreiser/Norris (background), O’NeillNaturalist works stress hereditary and environmental forces; O’Neill shows characters grappling with addiction and fate, yet striving for self‑awareness.
Speed, Technology, and ViolenceMarinettiThe Futurist manifesto glorifies the machine age, advocating a break with the past and embracing violent renewal.
Subjective Perception & InteriorityStein, Frost, Pound, O’NeillModernist texts prioritize inner experience—stream‑of‑consciousness, repetitive phrasing, and symbolic detail—over external plot.
Fragmentation & Formal ExperimentationStein, O’Neill, PoundNarrative voice is disrupted through repetition, layered dialogue, and imagist juxtaposition, reflecting a fractured modern reality.
Gender & Domestic SpaceGlaspell, SteinThe home becomes a site of hidden knowledge and feminist resistance; domestic details reveal deeper truths ignored by patriarchal authority.
Nature and Ambiguous AgencyFrost, PoundNatural settings serve as mirrors for metaphysical uncertainty, questioning whether nature embodies design or indifference.
Critique of ProgressMarinetti (celebration) vs. O’Neill (critique)While Futurism embraces technological advance, O’Neill’s fog‑shrouded family illustrates the psychic cost of industrial modernity.

Analysis

Analyzing these works through various critical lenses elucidates how they embody the shift from Naturalist determinism to Modernist experimentation.

Formalist Analysis (Imagist Techniques)

Ezra Pound’s insistence on “direct treatment of the ‘thing’” and economy of language is evident in both “Queen‑Anne’s‑Lace” and “Landscape with the Fall of Icarus.” The former’s visual precision—“white as the heart of a lily”—creates an immediate sensory impression, while the latter’s allusion to Bruegel compresses a complex commentary on modernity’s indifference into a single, stark image. A formalist reading highlights how Pound’s imagist rigor forces the reader to confront the object itself, bypassing explanatory narration and thereby intensifying the emotional resonance.

Feminist Reading (Glaspell’s Subversion)

Susan Glaspell’s Trifles exemplifies early feminist critique of patriarchal knowledge production. The men’s dismissal of the women’s observations as insignificant “trifles” mirrors the broader cultural devaluation of female experience. Yet, the women’s discovery of the dead canary—a symbol of Mrs. Wright’s stifled voice—enables them to reconstruct the motive behind the murder. By withholding this evidence, they enact a form of epistemic justice, asserting that truth resides not in official investigation but in the intimate, gendered domestic sphere.

Psycho‑analytic Approach (O’Neill’s Familial Trauma)

Eugene O’Neill’s Long Day’s Journey into Night lends itself to a psycho‑analytic reading that traces the family’s dysfunction to repressed desires and unresolved grief. James Tyrone’s miserliness stems from his fear of poverty, a trauma rooted in his immigrant origins; Mary’s morphine addiction can be interpreted as a retreat from the pain of her lost dreams and the disappointment of her marriage; Jamie’s alcoholism reflects a displaced aggression toward his father’s failed ambitions; Edmund’s illness confronts the family with mortality, prompting a desperate search for meaning. The pervasive fog operates as a psychic metaphor for the unconscious—obscuring vision yet simultaneously revealing the characters’ inner turmoil when it lifts.

Ecocritical Reading (Frost’s Nature Poems)

Robert Frost’s poems situate human agency within an ambiguous natural world. In “After Apple‑Picking,” the speaker’s fatigue and the lingering scent of apples suggest a communion between laborer and landscape, yet the sense of incompletion hints at nature’s indifference to human striving. “Design” pushes this ambiguity further: the juxtaposition of a white spider, moth, and heal‑all invokes the teleological argument (that nature exhibits purposeful design) only to undercut it with the possibility of randomness. An ecocritical lens reads these poems as questioning whether nature possesses intrinsic meaning or merely serves as a mirror for human projection.

Marxist / Technological Critique (Marinetti vs. O’Neill)

Marinetti’s Futurist manifesto can be read as an enthusiastic embrace of the capitalist drive toward mechanization, celebrating speed and violence as forces that will obliterate antiquated institutions. In stark contrast, O’Neill’s depiction of the Tyrone family’s entrapment in fog and addiction offers a critique of the alienating effects of industrial modernity—where technological advance does not liberate but exacerbates psychological fracture. This dialectic illuminates the tension between utopian technophilia and dystopian alienation that runs through early twentieth‑century American literature.

Conclusion

The trajectory from Naturalist determinism to Modernist experimentation captured in this unit reveals a profound reorientation of American literary concerns. Where earlier writers emphasized the inexorable forces of heredity and environment shaping human destiny, later authors turned inward, exploring the fragmented, subjective interior of the self and the ways language itself could be reshaped to mirror modern experience. The works examined—Marinetti’s incendiary manifesto, Glaspell’s quietly subversive drama, Stein’s linguistic loops, Frost’s meditative nature poems, Pound’s imagist precision, and O’Neill’s agonizing family saga—each contribute a distinct strand to this evolving tapestry. Together, they illustrate how American literature responded to the tumultuous social, technological, and psychological shifts of the early twentieth century, laying the foundation for the pluralistic, innovative voices that would define modernist and postmodernist expression in the decades to follow.